The 2015 election is done. We have a new Tory government – and one that gained about 25 seats. And much is being made of the Tories gaining 25 seats and the Labour losing 25. That happened, and it’s important. But from the perspective of the election (as opposed to the future) it’s a side effect. There are four stories to the election which are probably in reverse order of importance:
- How a party without a vision other than “We’re not as bad as the other guys” makes no inroads (The net change between Labour and the Tories was a two seat swing to Labour (eight Labour went Tory and ten Tory went Labour)).
- That the rise of UKIP soaked up a lot of disaffected voters who’d otherwise have voted “Kick the bums out” in favour of Labour (particularly in the North of England)
- The rise of the SNP (taking 40 seats off Labour and 10 off the Lib Dems)
- The disintegration of the Lib Dems who lost almost all their seats to whichever the competing party was as the party faithful had a real chance to make its opinions on the leadership known. The apparent Tory gain was caused by the disintegration of their coalition partners.
Money is a consensual myth. We currently have fiat money – money that is ultimately imaginary and only worth something because a government says it is, and people believe it and choose to treat it as if the money were real. And people work this out and think it’s ridiculous (it is). And that because it can print more money the government can devalue your savings (if your savings are in a sock under the bed it can; a house remains a house and a company a company regardless).
They then jump from there to one of a number of solutions – normally the Gold Standard, but there are other functionally indistinguishable ones including the Silver Standard, a price-fix based on a basket of commodities, and Bitcoin. And they all have the same flaws as fiat currency – you can’t eat them or take shelter under them and are only worth what people think they are. But rather than having a potential for the government printing more and thus reducing savings, they all suffer from the same thing. The Scrooge McDuck tax on everyone’s work.
Auto Tune and lip synching. The scourge of modern music. It wouldn’t have happened back in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, right? People believe music back then was authentic. And great acts like Queen would never mime. Right?
still a command performance by Freddie Mercury.
Some of the most blatant miming ever – and
In my last post about healthcare costs I compared the amount spent under the British system to bills from the American system, and it was far my most popular post so far. One of the most popular questions was about costs by procedure or condition so I started doing some research. And I ended up breaking the follow up post into three; one for Brits, one for Americans, and a nerd-post in which I share my workings. This is the nerd post; feel free to scroll past – that’s why it’s separated out from the UK and US healthcare posts.
It’s coming up to Christmas – and I’ve already spoken about the Salvation Army. There’s one other Christmas warning: Monopoly is only slightly a more suitable game than bare knuckle boxing. Just don’t do it.
There are plenty of people who say monopoly sucks. And as a game played at Christmas they are right. But Monopoly is very good at what it was designed to do (part of why it’s lasted). It’s just not suited for a family game (but is far better if you use the actual rules).
There are regularly stories (either in the news or viral) about how much American healthcare costs. I’ve blogged in the past about some of the causes. British healthcare is free at the point of delivery, so the patient doesn’t see the cost and people don’t know how expensive healthcare should be. But British internal prices are public information, so it’s easy to see approximately how much things cost in a well-run health service.
The prices do, however, need some interpreting and the government’s “simple guide” runs to 72 pages. I’m going to explain the system in a single (long) blog post. And then I’m going to take estimates of how much a British hospital bill would get for each of the linked hospital costs. The current costs are here (next year’s includes a 3.8% “efficiency saving” (read: underfunding)).
No knowledge is useless, and the world is fascinating. Even knowledge about the most seemingly inconsequential information can be incredibly revealing as I found out recently, and am going to share. A working knowledge of fashion shows a lot of what was wrong with what looked initially like an incredibly successful, powerful, and effective empire: The Third Reich, and its snappy uniforms.
Urban legend says they had great dress sense and it’s a pity they had Hugo Boss working for them, and his sense of style. (For the record he worked for the Nazi Party, not the Wehrmacht). Urban legend also says the Germans were great engineers and equipped their troops well early in the War. Looking at the standard Wehrmacht uniform (the M36 Feldbluse) we’re going to see whether this is true or whether it demonstrates a lot of what was wrong with the Nazi mindset.